"We keep you alive to serve this ship"
Ben Hur
Just observing things, It's really struck me over time how certain social programs, of the left and the right, basically amount to nothing other than serving the needs of businesses, particularly large business entities, no matter how they are styled. This is so much the case that certain huge proponents of some programs who would regard themselves as real fire breathing leftists are actually heavy-duty capitalists, and don't know it.
This shows in their justification for the programs.
Let's, once again, make reference to our evolved place in a state of nature, and where we are actually at.
In a state of nature we'd not do what most of us do daily, which is to leave our abode and clock in time somewhere else, to come back to our home. In our natural state, while we would leave our families, the family would be the focus all the time. In our industrial societies, our work is. Most people spend most of their lives with people they are brought in contact with solely because they serve an economic interest, and nothing else.
Men got there first, long before women. But starting in the early part of the 20th Century, if not slightly before, that changed for women and now women are basically expected to work away from their homes and families.
Everyone is.
When looked at this way, we see why left wing emphasis on child care, and paradoxically abortion, are part and parcel of serving industry. If women can be prevented from having children, they can, ie., they'll have to, go to work. That's what they should be doing, working. If they must have children for some weird biological and psychological reason, well then government sponsored child warehousing, i.e., daycare, will force them back into work in another fashion.
Either way, they'll be freed, i.e., forced, to serve work.
Almost all the post 1945 liberalization of domestic law and structure works this way. Easy no-fault divorce makes it easy to dump families, sending everyone unhindered and untethered into work. Where that results in women falling below the poverty line due to their children, as they foolishly chose to have children, government funded daycare will address it. Abortion must be kept legal, we are told, as it means women can go to work.
What if things didn't work this way?
Well, men would still be men, and women be women, but they'd have to fund their families themselves, and at least attempt to choose more wisely. That would have a lot of collateral impacts, but chief among them would be, frankly, less of a focus on work and more of a focus on the domestic.
But that would also mean that a society based on consumption, and which reduced its members to consumers, would be focused on families instead.
And then who is going to make and buy all that crap?
So the next time you here Bernie Sanders spouting off about something like universal child care, remember, what he's really saying, whether he means it or not, is:
"We keep you alive to serve this ship"
